Exeter & Yeovil
Moderators: Kingofstar, Chris_in_LA, lakespfc, Admin, General Mods
-
- Kev the Kitman
- Posts: 4767
- Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 9:39 am
- Location: London
Exeter & Yeovil
Homely west country opponents that one would have thought were a 'gimme' for 6 points. Of course, being simple country lads, they obeyed the diktat of their managers and did what every team will do when they come to FP - apart from parking buses, they also understand the 'pressing' game and understand that the stats will give them 30% possession and give us 70% possession.
Our Scouse manager huffs and puffs but doesn't succeed in blowing any houses down, because we don't frankly have the men to do it. Up front, Matt Tubbs doesn't understand what he is being asked to do and in and around the 6 yard box is profligate in the pursuit of the back of the net. Our play is totally predictable and dare I say it, in the pursuit of percentage possession, we run a lot, we stutter a lot, we cover every blade of grass, but we don't really look like scoring. We have a big squad, but we don't really have any possession nous - strangely even the bigger guys like Webster seem never to be called upon and Nigel has fallen out of favour. Oh - and we have 2 goalkeepers who do not inspire confidence even when they're fit and....well, that's it for now because I feel the need for a management 'tinker man' to get the old motivation going and getting rid of the platitudes - over to you, Paul! We have great expectations......
Our Scouse manager huffs and puffs but doesn't succeed in blowing any houses down, because we don't frankly have the men to do it. Up front, Matt Tubbs doesn't understand what he is being asked to do and in and around the 6 yard box is profligate in the pursuit of the back of the net. Our play is totally predictable and dare I say it, in the pursuit of percentage possession, we run a lot, we stutter a lot, we cover every blade of grass, but we don't really look like scoring. We have a big squad, but we don't really have any possession nous - strangely even the bigger guys like Webster seem never to be called upon and Nigel has fallen out of favour. Oh - and we have 2 goalkeepers who do not inspire confidence even when they're fit and....well, that's it for now because I feel the need for a management 'tinker man' to get the old motivation going and getting rid of the platitudes - over to you, Paul! We have great expectations......
Re: Exeter & Yeovil
Still, 4th place at this stage of the season and we'd all have taken that, wouldn't we, Pomp.
And don't forget that Cookie has shown that he doesn't always use his beloved 4-2-3-1....and I think he's hopefully coming to realise that a simple 4-4-2 or 3-5-2 does the job better in this league.
I'm convinced that had we played the whole match the way he set things up in the second half, i.e. 4-4-2, we'd have won.
Have to agree that we could do with better keepers but since the opposition don't see a lot of the ball I guess it's not going to affect us that much.
Like you I'd rather see Webster alongside Burgess.
However, if Webster then got injured and the Tractor Boys suddenly wanted Clarke back then we'd be short-staffed on fit centre backs.
And don't forget that Cookie has shown that he doesn't always use his beloved 4-2-3-1....and I think he's hopefully coming to realise that a simple 4-4-2 or 3-5-2 does the job better in this league.
I'm convinced that had we played the whole match the way he set things up in the second half, i.e. 4-4-2, we'd have won.
Have to agree that we could do with better keepers but since the opposition don't see a lot of the ball I guess it's not going to affect us that much.
Like you I'd rather see Webster alongside Burgess.
However, if Webster then got injured and the Tractor Boys suddenly wanted Clarke back then we'd be short-staffed on fit centre backs.
Stop looking for solutions to symptoms and start identifying the disease.
-
- Billy The Boot Boy
- Posts: 2204
- Joined: Sun Jul 25, 2010 5:16 pm
- Has liked: 15 times
- Been liked: 20 times
Re: Exeter & Yeovil
I feel we dont have the Centre Forward required to successfuly carry off the 4231 @ home, the ones we have are neither mobile enough, big enough & dont carry a significant goal threat. If we are too succeed playing that way @ home we need a far better CF than we currently have.
So for me tactically he needs to tweak it for home games. Personally I'd go with 352 & try & inject some pace into that central midfield area, we are so lacking movement there. Barton, Doyle & Hollands are all pedestrian.
So for me tactically he needs to tweak it for home games. Personally I'd go with 352 & try & inject some pace into that central midfield area, we are so lacking movement there. Barton, Doyle & Hollands are all pedestrian.
-
- Kev the Kitman
- Posts: 4767
- Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 9:39 am
- Location: London
Re: Exeter & Yeovil
I wouldn't argue with that - we have been lacking movement in the midfield since Nigel was removed, but if we play 3-5-2 that implies that they understand the system......I don't think they do! We certainly need more of a physical presence at set pieces and we are far too predictable.pompeygunner wrote:I feel we dont have the Centre Forward required to successfuly carry off the 4231 @ home, the ones we have are neither mobile enough, big enough & dont carry a significant goal threat. If we are too succeed playing that way @ home we need a far better CF than we currently have.
So for me tactically he needs to tweak it for home games. Personally I'd go with 352 & try & inject some pace into that central midfield area, we are so lacking movement there. Barton, Doyle & Hollands are all pedestrian.
Re: Exeter & Yeovil
Can't disagree with that. The players you mentioned are all good ball holders and maybe you need one of them in the middle but the others must have a wide range of passing ability, most importantly the subtle through ball, that unexpected switch. I still think Atangana can do a job. He does look for that unusual pass every now and then.pompeygunner wrote:Personally I'd go with 352 & try & inject some pace into that central midfield area, we are so lacking movement there. Barton, Doyle & Hollands are all pedestrian.
But even so I think Cook doesn't need to do much to ensure we maintain our position as one of the top four or five and I think we have the squad to see out the season with play-offs, at the very least, almost a certainty....and probably automatic promotion.
Still, nice discussing fine tweaks to the team rather than wholesale personnel, management, formation and footballing philosophy changes like last season.
I'm still enjoying Pompey's football even though it'd be nice to test our opponents' 'keeper a bit more.
Stop looking for solutions to symptoms and start identifying the disease.
- The Cincinnati Kid
- Guy Whittingham
- Posts: 9512
- Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2006 10:19 pm
- Location: Cincinnati
- Been liked: 17 times
Re: Exeter & Yeovil
I'll tell you what we do lack.....a couple of chumpionship players in on a season loan. We never seem to be that well connected on this front and Capt. Cook would do well to sort it out. The club needs to be better connected.
Div III. Call it what it is.
-
- Alan Knight
- Posts: 818
- Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 5:23 pm
- Location: Portsmouth
Re: Exeter & Yeovil
Erm, Clarke and McCarey from the Chumps and Stockley from the Premier League?The Cincinnati Kid wrote:I'll tell you what we do lack.....a couple of chumpionship players in on a season loan. We never seem to be that well connected on this front and Capt. Cook would do well to sort it out. The club needs to be better connected.
Ahh Frazzles, the king of snack foods...
- Selsey Bill
- Interim Manager
- Posts: 6311
- Joined: Thu Jun 01, 2006 4:25 pm
- Has liked: 60 times
- Been liked: 69 times
Re: Exeter & Yeovil
It's a shame McGurk got injured when he did as I think he is what we need up front. Also, I don't believe Nigel Atangana has fallen out of favour - he an been carrying an injury. We also miss Murphy in goal - his distribution is so much quicker. Missed the game on Saturday as was away, but I understand from one of my sons who was there that (the much maligned by many) Kyle Bennett was our best player again.
Re: Exeter & Yeovil
Yes...McGurk is a big miss. Hope big Nige gets back soon.Selsey Bill wrote:It's a shame McGurk got injured when he did as I think he is what we need up front. Also, I don't believe Nigel Atangana has fallen out of favour - he an been carrying an injury. We also miss Murphy in goal - his distribution is so much quicker. Missed the game on Saturday as was away, but I understand from one of my sons who was there that (the much maligned by many) Kyle Bennett was our best player again.
Stop looking for solutions to symptoms and start identifying the disease.
Create an account or sign in to join the discussion
You need to be a member in order to post a reply
Create an account
Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute
Sign in
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 25 Replies
- 2377 Views
-
Last post by GreenBlue
-
- 21 Replies
- 2250 Views
-
Last post by Selsey Bill
-
- 7 Replies
- 910 Views
-
Last post by StMonkton
-
- 14 Replies
- 674 Views
-
Last post by jam tomorrow
-
- 1 Replies
- 450 Views
-
Last post by almondsbury