calling any nutritionist - better than Google #96

General chat room. Pompey related or not, but PLEASE keep it reasonably clean.

Moderators: Kingofstar, Chris_in_LA, lakespfc, Admin, General Mods

Post Reply
<dj.>
Billy The Boot Boy
Posts: 1378
Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 1:41 pm
Location: Milton

calling any nutritionist - better than Google #96

Post by <dj.> »

After a delicious starter of gin and tonic (Fever Tree, of course) I had a slow cooked dinner of pork and courgettes tonight. With it I drank a 75cl bottle of Healey's Classis Oak Matured Cornish Cider. http://thecornishcyderfarm.co.uk/shop/h ... k-matured/ Again, truly delicious! The cider is 7.4% alcohol, which by my simple mathematics means that it must be 92.6% apples.

Can I count this as one of my five a day?
User avatar
Pompski!
Guy Whittingham
Posts: 9873
Joined: Mon May 15, 2006 1:22 pm
Location: Cambridgeshire
Has liked: 6 times
Been liked: 2 times

Re: calling any nutritionist - better than Google #96

Post by Pompski! »

What I don't get about the BS that is the 5-a-day lark is that a "portion" is meant to be a handful. Therefore about 20 grapes is the same as about 200 raisins. How can that be?!
I am me, the universe and you.
... and chips
Kev the Kitman
Posts: 4040
Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 9:48 pm
Location: Down North

Re: calling any nutritionist - better than Google #96

Post by ... and chips »

Pompski! wrote:What I don't get about the BS that is the 5-a-day lark is that a "portion" is meant to be a handful. Therefore about 20 grapes is the same as about 200 raisins. How can that be?!
Isn't is just (very) basic guidance so people get some vitamins, minerals and fibre in their diet?
User avatar
Pompski!
Guy Whittingham
Posts: 9873
Joined: Mon May 15, 2006 1:22 pm
Location: Cambridgeshire
Has liked: 6 times
Been liked: 2 times

Re: calling any nutritionist - better than Google #96

Post by Pompski! »

... and chips wrote:
Pompski! wrote:What I don't get about the BS that is the 5-a-day lark is that a "portion" is meant to be a handful. Therefore about 20 grapes is the same as about 200 raisins. How can that be?!
Isn't is just (very) basic guidance so people get some vitamins, minerals and fibre in their diet?
Correct. Apparantly they picked 5 because they thought that was the maximum people would consume per day without complaining. Nothing to do with being the perfect level of nutrients etc.
I am me, the universe and you.
Purbrook Chimes
Kev the Kitman
Posts: 2695
Joined: Mon May 15, 2006 1:01 pm
Location: Purbrook

Re: calling any nutritionist - better than Google #96

Post by Purbrook Chimes »

Pompski! wrote:
... and chips wrote:
Pompski! wrote:What I don't get about the BS that is the 5-a-day lark is that a "portion" is meant to be a handful. Therefore about 20 grapes is the same as about 200 raisins. How can that be?!
Isn't is just (very) basic guidance so people get some vitamins, minerals and fibre in their diet?
Correct. Apparantly they picked 5 because they thought that was the maximum people would consume per day without complaining. Nothing to do with being the perfect level of nutrients etc.
I was told its 8 in France
User avatar
Earl Grey
Interim Manager
Posts: 6015
Joined: Sun Jun 04, 2006 10:36 am
Location: Here be dragons!

Re: calling any nutritionist - better than Google #96

Post by Earl Grey »

Pompski! wrote:
... and chips wrote:
Pompski! wrote:What I don't get about the BS that is the 5-a-day lark is that a "portion" is meant to be a handful. Therefore about 20 grapes is the same as about 200 raisins. How can that be?!
Isn't is just (very) basic guidance so people get some vitamins, minerals and fibre in their diet?
Correct. Apparantly they picked 5 because they thought that was the maximum people would consume per day without complaining. Nothing to do with being the perfect level of nutrients etc.
I can recall as a child being told by the headmaster of my junior school that you should chew each mouthful of food 33 times. I don't know if he got the Daily Mail but these arbitrary pieces of wisdom are to be found everywhere. It's astonishing how seldom these homilies are challenged as so often they're not based on any scientific criteria but are chosen because they're great sound-bites (sorry!).
Stop looking for solutions to symptoms and start identifying the disease.
User avatar
Ziggy Sawdust
Kev the Kitman
Posts: 2951
Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 8:42 pm

Re: calling any nutritionist - better than Google #96

Post by Ziggy Sawdust »

<dj.> wrote:After a delicious starter of gin and tonic (Fever Tree, of course) I had a slow cooked dinner of pork and courgettes tonight. With it I drank a 75cl bottle of Healey's Classis Oak Matured Cornish Cider. http://thecornishcyderfarm.co.uk/shop/h ... k-matured/ Again, truly delicious! The cider is 7.4% alcohol, which by my simple mathematics means that it must be 92.6% apples.

Can I count this as one of my five a day?
Yup
<dj.>
Billy The Boot Boy
Posts: 1378
Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 1:41 pm
Location: Milton

Re: calling any nutritionist - better than Google #96

Post by <dj.> »

Correct answer Ziggy!

Not only that, I've now discovered that it doesn't count towards my 3-4 units of alcohol per day because it's one of my five fruit and veg. Clearly it would be double counting to put it in both lists.

I believe Pomp can do the same with his acceptable claret, as a glass of grape juice counts as one of his 5 a day.
User avatar
Ziggy Sawdust
Kev the Kitman
Posts: 2951
Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 8:42 pm

Re: calling any nutritionist - better than Google #96

Post by Ziggy Sawdust »

<dj.> wrote:Correct answer Ziggy!

Not only that, I've now discovered that it doesn't count towards my 3-4 units of alcohol per day because it's one of my five fruit and veg. Clearly it would be double counting to put it in both lists.

I believe Pomp can do the same with his acceptable claret, as a glass of grape juice counts as one of his 5 a day.
Superb news! That works for me too with the grapes.
Here comes AFC
Alan Knight
Posts: 887
Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2011 12:17 pm

Re: calling any nutritionist - better than Google #96

Post by Here comes AFC »

<dj.> wrote:I've now discovered that it doesn't count towards my 3-4 units of alcohol per day
That's an arbitrary number as well
User avatar
Pompski!
Guy Whittingham
Posts: 9873
Joined: Mon May 15, 2006 1:22 pm
Location: Cambridgeshire
Has liked: 6 times
Been liked: 2 times

Re: calling any nutritionist - better than Google #96

Post by Pompski! »

<dj.> wrote:3-4 units of alcohol per day.
3-4? three TO four? I've been reading it as 34 units a day all these years. *hic*.
I am me, the universe and you.
Post Reply

Create an account or sign in to join the discussion

You need to be a member in order to post a reply

Create an account

Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute

Register

Sign in