Well Jesus couldn't possibly be against gay adoption. After all he had two dads and one of them was an adulterous rapist.phat_chris wrote:Wimbledon Blue wrote:How could Jesus be against homosexuality when he spent so much time in the company of so many menuspompeyfan wrote:In many ways he would have been on social issues. He was humble and served the poor and needy more than the religeous leaders, as religion in itself is bad (as I've said constantly). He teaches love and grace.Ronald Dinlo wrote:i've never really understood the christian right in america. from what i've read about jesus, i reckon he'd be more your socialist / bleeding heart liberal kinda guy
The main difference that doesn't make him a liberal is his attitude towards what modern day, would be considered entitlements. He believed that those who were capable of work, should work. He believed in fiscal conservatism and debt was wrong. He was adamant that mrriage was one man and one woman and was against homosexuality, so again, that would be leaning to the right.
All in all leaning a little to the left, little to the right, but fiscally conservative.
I didn't think the bible actually said that Jesus was against Homesexuality? And if it did I thought it contradicted itself on this matter?
Or is this a new testament thing?
Stephen Fry's take on the US elections
Moderators: Kingofstar, Chris_in_LA, lakespfc, Admin, General Mods
- Pompski!
- Guy Whittingham
- Posts: 9873
- Joined: Mon May 15, 2006 1:22 pm
- Location: Cambridgeshire
- Has liked: 6 times
- Been liked: 2 times
Re: Stephen Fry's take on the US elections
I am me, the universe and you.
Create an account or sign in to join the discussion
You need to be a member in order to post a reply
Create an account
Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute